I love The New York Times but they're just not getting it. This article seeks to explain how Trump's policies may backfire against workers but, after reading half way through, it feels like they're baffling me with bullshit.
In contrast, Trump's message that he'll 'slap a 45% tax on Chinese goods and that'll stop 'em from stealing our jobs' is straightforward, easy to understand and seems to makes sense.
If you're gonna argue against a simple argument, make sure your argument is just as simple and straightforward. Otherwise, you're gonna lose the Donald Trump voter. Heck, you lost me, and I'm not even voting for Trump.
In contrast, Trump's message that he'll 'slap a 45% tax on Chinese goods and that'll stop 'em from stealing our jobs' is straightforward, easy to understand and seems to makes sense.
If you're gonna argue against a simple argument, make sure your argument is just as simple and straightforward. Otherwise, you're gonna lose the Donald Trump voter. Heck, you lost me, and I'm not even voting for Trump.
No comments:
Post a Comment